Assessor: Sarah Schumann
All South African cycads as well as this species is included in Appendix I of the CITES Convention which lists all species threatened with extinction that are, or may be affected by trade. According to the SANBI Red List Assessment, this species is Critically Endangered as it is threatened by over-collecting for ornamental purposes, plant pathogens, habitat loss, the fusarium fungus and thus subsequent reproductive failure (Donaldson 2009). Cycad species are in trade demand and at risk from illegal collection (Smith 2014; Yeld 2014). Studies present strong evidence of ongoing and accelerating rates of decline in most cycad species due mainly to illegal removal and this is especially evident with endangered and critically endangered Encephalartos species (Okubamichael et al. 2016; Cousins & Witkowski 2017). This species has a low and decreasing remaining population and cannot sustain ongoing removal from the wild (CITES 2003). This could bring the species to extinction. The CITES Trade Database has recorded the trade of the species from 1983-2019 for commercial, personal, scientific, artificial propagation and botanical garden purposes. Sourced from artificial propagation, and taken from the wild.
CITES trade statistics derived from the CITES Trade Database, UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK.
Cousins, S.R. and Witkowski, E.T.F., 2017. African cycad ecology, ethnobotany and conservation: a synthesis. The Botanical Review, 83(2), pp.152-194.
Donaldson, J.S. 2009. Encephalartos laevifolius Stapf & Burtt Davy. National Assessment: Red List of South African Plants version 2020.1.
Okubamichael, D. Y., S. L. Jack, J. D. Bösenberg, M. T. Hoffman & J. S. Donaldson. 2016. Repeat photography confirms alarming decline in south African cycads. Biodiversity Conservation 25(11): 2153–2170.
PC14 Doc.9.2.2 – Annex 1. 2003. Review of Significant Trade – Cycads. Presented at the 14th Meeting of the CITES Plants Committee, Windhoek, February 2004. Information compiled by TRAFFIC East and Southern Africa (TESA).Donaldson, J.S. 2003. Cycads. Status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Cycad Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland; Cambridge, UK.
Smith, D. 2014. 1 September 2014. South Africa's ancient cycad plants under threat from poachers. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/01/ancient-cycad-plants-under-threat-poachers
Yeld, J. 2014. 7 August 2014. Cycad thieves strike again. IOL. Available at: https://www.iol.co.za/news/cycad-thieves-strike-again-1731799
95 individuals are left in the wild based on the unpublished Red List assessment (Bösenberg. DW, personal communication 2021, 1 December).
The CITES Trade Database has recorded the trade of live individuals, stems and seeds. There is evidence that mature individuals are removed from the wild and that stem harvesting is also taking place (Donaldson 2009).
CITES trade statistics derived from the CITES Trade Database, UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK
Donaldson, J.S. 2009. Encephalartos laevifolius Stapf & Burtt Davy. National Assessment: Red List of South African Plants version 2020.1.
Few remaining individuals in the wild with several threats places the persistence of this species whereby recruitment and recovery may be poor were exploitation to continue (Donaldson 2009).
Donaldson, J.S. 2009. Encephalartos laevifolius Stapf & Burtt Davy. National Assessment: Red List of South African Plants version 2020.1.